top of page

Stakater Blog

Follow our blog for the latest updates in the world of DevSecOps, Cloud and Kubernetes

Rasheed Amir

GitHub Actions vs Bitbucket Pipelines vs GitLab CI vs Tekton: The Best CI/CD tool for you?

Continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) are essential components of modern software development. They enable developers to automate the build, test, and deployment process, improving the speed and quality of software releases. There are many CI/CD tools available, but in this article, we'll compare four popular tools: GitHub Actions, Bitbucket Pipelines, GitLab CI, and Tekton. We'll discuss the features of each tool to help you decide which one is right for your needs.


GitHub Actions

GitHub Actions is a feature of the popular Git repository hosting service, GitHub. It provides developers with a way to automate their workflow directly within the GitHub platform, eliminating the need for separate CI/CD tools. GitHub Actions allows developers to create workflows using YAML files, which can be version-controlled along with the codebase. This enables developers to manage their code and workflow in the same repository, improving visibility and collaboration.


One of the major benefits of GitHub Actions is its tight integration with GitHub. Since GitHub is already a popular platform for hosting code repositories, integrating CI/CD workflows within the same platform simplifies the development process. GitHub Actions also has a large library of pre-built actions, making it easy for developers to get started with automation.


Bitbucket Pipelines

Bitbucket Pipelines is a CI/CD tool provided by Atlassian's Bitbucket, a popular Git repository hosting service similar to GitHub. Bitbucket Pipelines enables developers to automate their build, test, and deployment process using YAML files, just like GitHub Actions. However, Bitbucket Pipelines also provides a visual interface for creating and managing workflows, making it easy for non-technical team members to contribute.


Bitbucket Pipelines also has strong integration with the rest of the Atlassian suite of tools, including Jira and Confluence. This integration allows developers to track their code changes and deployment status within the same platform, improving visibility and collaboration. For those looking to deploy applications on Kubernetes or OpenShift, SAAP Kubernetes & OpenShift and Openshift as a Service by Stakater offer robust solutions to streamline your CI/CD workflows.


GitLab CI

GitLab CI is a part of GitLab, an open-source Git repository management system. GitLab CI enables developers to create and manage CI/CD pipelines using YAML files, just like GitHub Actions and Bitbucket Pipelines. GitLab CI provides developers with a complete DevOps platform, including source code management, continuous integration, continuous deployment, and container registry.


GitLab CI provides developers with an extensive library of pre-built templates and integration with third-party tools, such as Kubernetes and AWS. GitLab CI also provides features for running security scans and performance testing within the CI/CD pipeline.


Tekton

Tekton is a Kubernetes-native CI/CD tool that provides developers with a way to build and deploy applications in a container-based environment. Tekton allows developers to create and manage CI/CD pipelines using Kubernetes resources, making it easy to integrate with existing Kubernetes infrastructure.


Tekton provides developers with a powerful set of tools for building, testing, and deploying applications in a container-based environment. Tekton also provides a large library of reusable components, making it easy for developers to get started with automation.


Comparing GitHub Actions, Bitbucket Pipelines, GitLab CI, and Tekton

Now that we've discussed the features of each CI/CD tool, let's compare them based on a few key factors


Ease of use

All four tools provide developers with an easy-to-use YAML syntax for defining workflows. Bitbucket Pipelines also provides a visual interface for creating and managing workflows, making it more accessible to non-technical team members.


Integration

All four tools integrate tightly with their respective hosting platforms. GitLab CI also provides integration with third party tools, such as Kubernetes and AWS, making it a great choice for organizations using these technologies.


Scalability

Since GitLab CI and Tekton are designed to work in a container-based environment, they are highly scalable and can handle large workloads. However, GitHub Actions and Bitbucket Pipelines are also capable of scaling up to handle large workloads, thanks to their cloud-based infrastructure.


Pricing

GitHub Actions and Bitbucket Pipelines have a similar pricing model, charging based on usage. GitLab CI offers a free version for self-hosted deployments, and Tekton is entirely open-source and free to use.


In summary, each of these CI/CD tools has its strengths and weaknesses. GitHub Actions is an excellent choice for developers who already use GitHub as their code repository, while Bitbucket Pipelines is a good choice for organizations that use other Atlassian tools. GitLab CI and Tekton are both great choices for organizations that use Kubernetes or need a more comprehensive DevOps platform. We have also written a more detailed comparison between Tekton and Jenkins in case you would like to look at it.


Ultimately, the right CI/CD tool for an organization will depend on its specific needs and the technologies they use. If you’re looking to get started with your own CI/CD tools, SAAP and Stakater Cloud, come configured with 30 tools including extensive support for CI/CD pipeline. We recommend evaluating each tool based on factors such as ease of use, integration, scalability, and pricing to determine which one is the best fit for your organization.



7,021 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page